I'm not sure if this PC Mag article is more interesting due to its content, or due to the fact that it is dated as having been published June 22, 2004... which is currently the future.
Were I posting from the future, I would want to pass on more info than just how to protect one's e-mail address.
Regardless, this man from the future does indeed relate a tale of how to protect your e-mail address online.
The main point of this article seems to be that upon some level of testing that was done, this could be seen:
The easiest way is to spell out the "@" sign and the period, like this: brian at example dot com. In the Center's study, addresses that had been obscured in this simple way on Web pages did not receive a single piece of spam.
This is retarded in many ways, but correct in many others.
Just because you do that, it doesn't negate the ability for spam harvesting bots to get your e-mail address - all they need to do is a search on the page for: word space "at" space word space "dot" space word - where that last word is "com", "edu", "org", or "net" and they will get the bulk of the content.
But it will indeed bypass the old and simple e-mail harvesting programs.
The article also states that you could put your e-mail address into an image. That prevents blind people from seeing it, and if you are a commercial entity in the States, that leaves an opening for them to sue you - the same problem that my proposed concept (and the ensuing great ideas from others that were spawned by that) falls to. That idea being essentially the same as the image, but entirely created via HTML and CSS tags.
He then mentions that there are other ways to encode it as well - which incidentally is essentially what MovableType (The software that runs this blog) does to e-mail addresses you enter.
The downsides to those are still issues with either blind (sorry, "vision impaired") reader programs or people that have JavaScript turned off.
In the end, the best thing is to be aware of the problem and know that there are certain things that are more likely to either get harvested, or get you on to lists.
If you buy something off of a reputable dealer online (Amazon?), then they likely aren't going to send your e-mail spam (outside of their settings of notifications and "you might like this" if you have that allowed in your profile).
They also aren't in a position where they need to sell your address in order to make more money (this was a big problem during the "dot bomb" era when as a last ditch effort, companies were selling off their user contact info in order to recover some of their money.
But if you are on a site that sends greeting cards, or is a gambling site, or porn, or any number of things that are more of a fringe area of the net - you are very likely to get harvested and/or sold off for a quick buck.
Posted by Eric at June 5, 2004 12:27 PM
| TrackBack
As for the NATO phonetic standard - that is an interesting concept. The main issue with that being that it is a directly translation, so if they wanted to translate it, they could easily.
The matter really becomes whether or not enough people are doing it to merit the work to be done to scan for that.
If you can get 1 million e-mail addresses just in plaintext, why bother to get a few hundred that are in the NATO standard.
As for the MT preview - excellent question. When I installed it, MT defaults to having the preview button there - but when it gets used, there is an error on the screen.
I looked up the error and some people get it, some don't - and it doesn't always show up.
Enough people on their support boards were having issues with it and no resolution that I found it easier to just disable the feature rather than have to deal with support e-mails on here over the errors.
I will look into it again to see if I can get it worked out.
Posted by: Eric at June 6, 2004 05:34 PM
Hi Eric,
I've seen the occasional address munged like this:
n a m e a t e x a m p l e d o t c o m
Does anyone know if address-harvesters do translate the NATO phonetic alphabet into a real address? (Sure, they theoretically can, but somebody would have to program it, and spammers are lazy as well as stupid.)
november alpha mike echo alpha tango echo x-ray alpha mike papa lima echo delta oscar tango charlie oscar mike
All the words are in plain text, so blind people's screen readers will read and say each word, and there's no problem of having to use unreadable graphics, Javascript, HTML entities, CSS, etc. (If someone wants to, the words can even be rewritten so that the screen reader's artificial "voice" will pronounce them more clearly! Depending on how that's done, it might munge the text just enough so spammers can't use a simple program to extract the letters.)
Just my $0.02.
(BTW is there some reason not to config MT to put a Preview button next to the Post button?)
Posted by: Mark Odell at June 6, 2004 02:14 PM